The UAE’s Ministry of Finance (MoF) ruled out any plan to hike value-added tax (VAT) following Saudi Arabia’s announcement of a three-fold increase in VAT on Monday.

VAT was introduced in the UAE on January 1, 2018 at five per cent on several goods and services.

Younis Haji Al Khoori, Undersecretary of MoF, said the focus is to work with all government entities to assess the priorities for the post-Covid-19 stage. Furthermore, the ministry will reorient the financial resources to prepare for the future and continued growth to ensure the security and safety of the communities.

In a surprise move, Riyadh increased VAT rate from five per cent to 15 per cent and also suspended the cost of living allowance to increase revenues with effect from June 1, 2020.

Sources and industry executive privy to the matter said that contrary to the Saudi move, the UAE was mulling dropping VAT temporarily until the situation surrounding Covid-19 is stabilised and the economy returns back on track.

Also, many European and Asian countries are turning to emergency tax breaks to support their economies against the Covid-19 threat. India, China, Finland, South Africa, Bulgaria, the US and the EU have announced some form of relief for their businesses and consumers in taxes to cope with the virus.

“We at the MoF are studying our financial systems to ensure their readiness to manage the next stage and support all vital sectors. We are devising several programmes and projects to enhance our ability to continue the development process and to put people as our top priority. This is essential to build a secure future and achieve the well-being and stability of our society. The UAE has always been keen to take precautionary measures and launch financial initiatives, which protect the national economy and support various business sectors in the country,” said Al Khoori.

Analysts told Khaleej Times that increasing VAT would hurt the UAE’s non-oil sectors and also dampen consumer confidence at a time when the governments around the world are trying to stimulate demand to boost economies.

Khatija Haque, head of Mena Research at Emirates NBD, said hiking VAT in the UAE would be counterproductive as the emirate’s budget commitments are not as large as Saudi Arabia’s.

“While we do expect the UAE’s budget deficit to register a significant deficit of around 10 per cent of GDP in 2020, this follows two years of budget surpluses. Raising VAT in the UAE at a time when consumers are already struggling with layoffs and paycuts and businesses have seen demand contract severely would be counterproductive. It would not raise non-oil revenue significantly and further weigh on already weak aggregate demand,” she said.

Source:https://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/vat-in-uae/uae-rules-out-any-change-in-vat-rate-after-saudi-hikes-it-to-15-

The UAE and Bahrain are unlikely to follow Saudi Arabia in increasing value-added tax (VAT), says tax experts.

In a surprise move on Monday, Saudi Arabia increased VAT threefold to 15 per cent and also suspended the cost of living allowance to increase revenues.

“Cost of living allowance will be suspended as of June 1, and VAT will be increased to 15 per cent from 5 per cent as of July 1,” the Kingdom’s state news agency said on Monday.

Mayank Sawhney, managing director at MaxGrowth Consultancy, said the Kingdom’s move will prompt a discussion in the UAE and other neighbouring countries to increase the VAT rate in their respective countries.

“However, any such move could be detrimental to businesses and consumers in these countries, who have already been adversely impacted by coronavirus. Therefore, it is unlikely that the authorities in UAE and Bahrain will increase the VAT rates at this stage,” said Sawhney.

An official response from the UAE’s Ministry of Finance was awaited at the time of publishing this report online. The UAE had previously announced that it will not increase VAT for the next few years.

Sources and industry executive said that contrary to the Saudi move, the UAE was mulling dropping VAT temporarily until the situation surrounding Covid-19 is stabilised and economy returns back on track.

In fact, many European and Asian countries are turning to emergency tax breaks to support their economies against the Covid-19 threat. India, China, Finland, South Africa, Bulgaria, the US and the EU have announced some form of relief for their businesses and consumers in taxes to cope with the virus.

Anurag Chaturvedi, CEO, Chartered House Tax Consultancy, says considering current situation surrounding the pandemic and its impact, it will not be favourable decision to increase taxes.

“GCC governments are providing stimulus to support businesses against Covid-19 and any increase in taxes will reverse the effect and may result in deeper recession with increased inflation. KSA has more internal demand and can sustain the increased taxes whereas other GCC countries are more dependent on sectors like tourism, global trade and logistics etc. which will become unattractive by increasing tax,” added Chaturvedi, who is also secretary for ICAI – Dubai chapter.

Thomas Vanhee, partner at Aurifer Middle East Tax Consultancy, believes that the UAE and Bahrain could follow KSA given the similarities in their economic conditions but the UAE has different dynamics as compared to other countries.

“Given the similarity and the interdependency of the KSA economy with the UAE and Bahrain, it is not inconceivable that these countries will follow suit. The situation of the UAE may be slightly different since it is a confederation and not a unitary state. The dynamics between the Emirates may play out differently,” said Vanhee.

Impact of increasing VAT

Vanhee added that a hike in the VAT rate will impact consumer confidence.

“From a business perspective, those businesses which may have cared less about a mere 5 per cent VAT, will now increasingly turn their attention to transactions subject to VAT to ensure compliance and, more importantly, no VAT leakage. The economy is currently in a fragile state, therefore, this measure will be carefully weighed.”

Sawhney of MaxGrowth Consultancy noted that the increase in VAT rates in UAE in the current environment is going to have a significant adverse impact on businesses and consumers in the country.

“It could prompt exodus of more people from UAE, as such move will increase the cost of living while many people struggle to cope up with given their reduced income in the current environment on account of Covid-19,” said Mayank.

Anurag Chaturvedi noted that the impact of hiking VAT will depend on the size of the increase.

“Any increase in tax will tend to discourage activity and output. Increase in VAT may distort the choices made by households, businesses, and the foreign sector in some way.”

Source:https://www.khaleejtimes.com/coronavirus-pandemic/uae-bahrain-unlikely-to-follow-saudi-in-hiking-vat-experts

Question: I had handed over my shares and securities to my broker to cover the cost of any investments which I may make in future. I find that he has used those securities without my consent for trading on his own. I am now finding it difficult to retrieve those shares and securities though he has promised to do so in the near future. I am very much concerned about this misuse done by some brokers. Is the government taking any steps to protect investors from unscrupulous brokers?

The regulator, Securities & Exchange Board of India, has last month issued a directive that brokers can accept collateral from clients in the form of shares and securities solely for the purpose of margin pledge created in the depository system. It has prohibited brokers from making an off-market transfer of shares and securities because such transfers tantamount to change in ownership and cannot be treated as a pledge. It has been further clarified that transfer of securities to the demat account of a broker who may be a trading member or clearing member of a stock exchange is prohibited.

It is also specified in the circular issued by SEBI that brokers should open a separate demat account for accepting ‘margin pledge’. This action has been taken by SEBI to protect the interest of investors like you who have suffered in the past as a result of broking firms illegally pledging shares belonging to their clients with banks and non-banking finance companies to raise money with which the brokers enter into business activities for themselves. In case of defaults made by brokers in the past, they may apply for insolvency, but the clients whose shares have been illegally transferred have been left without recourse and would suffer losses. Therefore, in future, you should specify when you hand over your shares and securities to a broker that these should be used only as ‘margin pledge’ and should be credited by the broker in a separate demat account pertaining to such ‘margin pledge’.

Q: Auditors in the past have been found to be negligent in not reporting financial irregularities committed by companies. Shareholders and investors have therefore suffered and their investments have lost value. This brings no relief to shareholders even if the auditor is debarred from practice. Is anything being done about this?

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has now made it mandatory for auditors to furnish details of tangible and intangible assets belonging to the company, loans given to promoters and related parties and a report on whistle blower complaints. If there is a discrepancy of more than 10% in inventories, the auditors are required to report this fact in their report to shareholders. If title deeds of immovable properties are not in the name of the company, the auditor would have to report the same.

The auditor of the holding company is required to disclose any adverse remarks which may be made by auditors of the subsidiary companies. He will also be required to give an opinion on financial ratios, the age and expected dates of realisation of financial assets and payment of financial liabilities. To reduce manipulation of books of account, auditors will have to verify whether quarterly statements filed with banks are in agreement with the books of account. Earlier, under the Companies Auditors’ Report Order, 2016, comments had to be given by auditors on 21 issues. This has now been increased to 50 issues under the revised order of 2020.

Q: My son who is working in India is required to travel to some South East Asian countries. I want to know whether any travel policy is available which would cover risks like corona virus?

Most insurance companies are not issuing new policies for travel to China and other South East Asian countries, including Hong Kong and Macau, in the wake of an advisory issued by those Governments. However, some companies like Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. issue policies through the underwriting process which will be in operation until the advisory is withdrawn. Companies like ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. have retained the option to issue the policy on a case by case basis depending upon the perceived risks. Insurance companies generally assess the situation before issuing a policy, considering the region or area where the travel is to be undertaken.

A multi-trip or annual policy does not require the applicant to give details of his travel in advance. Hence, policies are generally issued. However, at the time of claim, expenses relating to China are rejected on the ground that an advisory has been issued for not travelling to that country. Generally, people are being treated or quarantined at Government facilities. Therefore, the claim for medical expenses would not arise.

Source:https://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/local/mandatory-for-auditors-to-furnish-details-of-tangible-and-intangible-assets